Divorce Mediation vs. Litigation: Choosing Your Path

Divorce mediation vs. litigation is often the first big decision in a California divorce. Both paths end in a court judgment. They differ in who makes the decisions, how long the process takes and how much conflict it involves.

In mediation, a neutral mediator helps both spouses negotiate. The spouses make the decisions themselves, set their own pace and keep the details mostly private, since mediation communications are generally confidential. Mediation tends to be faster and less costly. It works well when spouses can communicate, share information honestly and want to preserve a co-parenting relationship.

In litigation, each spouse has an attorney who advocates for them, and a judge decides the issues the spouses can’t settle. Litigation offers formal discovery tools, such as subpoenas and depositions, which matter when one spouse may be hiding income or assets. It also gives a path forward when there’s domestic violence, intimidation or a spouse who refuses to engage. The trade-off is time, expense and public court records.

Many cases use both. Spouses may mediate the parenting plan and litigate a business valuation, or start in mediation and move to court only if talks break down. Even in litigation, Los Angeles family courts require custody mediation through Family Court Services before a judge decides custody.

Law & Mediation Offices of Dan DeSario & Associates, a Los Angeles law and mediation practice founded in 1982, helps clients choose based on their goals and the other spouse’s behavior. The right process is the one that protects both your interests and your family’s future.

This article is general information about California family law and is not legal advice. Every case is different. Attorney advertising.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back To Top